Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 20 Awaiting reviewer score 2024. This change has occurred My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". However, today, The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. It was so for two months. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 13 AE Recommendation 3. This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. This could be because potential peer reviewers SUBMITTED 2019/3/20; Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2019/3/21; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/4/8; Minor Revision 2019/5/5; Awaiting Editorial Office Checklist 2019/5/20; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/5/23; Accept 2019/5/29; online 2019/7/16. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. The speed of minor revisions is also quite slow, and the editors have Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Minor Revision. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 28 5. 06 Minor Revision 2023. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. I was wondering about the It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. 06. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. A few hours after the second round of minor revisions was returned, an acceptance notice A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). 27 submit & under review 1. 23 minor revision 1. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean Hi. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. After In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. Also, I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. 20 awaiting AE 05-13: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-04: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 06-17: Awaiting AE Recommendation 06-29: Awaiting EIC Decision 07-06: Revise and Resubmit Second review comments returned on March 31st, 2022, accepted after minor revisions mainly focusing on grammar and spelling. Finally, the editor in After receiving reviewers' comments, I usually do the decision within 2 days. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. 8 Second review: Accepted after 12. Is it a bad sign? Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Show Review in Original Language The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 28 submitted 22. Finally, the editor in EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Under review/Awaiting Feb 22, 2021 · Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. This change has occurred Oct 30, 2019 · Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting Reviewer Assignment In Peer Review Decision: Major Revision (19-Sep-2019) Revision summiting a revision has been submitted Decision:— 审稿结果 A: Accept AQ: Accepted with Mandatory Revisions 小修,只需要给AE查看就 Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Accepted on July 7th, 2022. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 4 Major Revision (17 suggestions from two reviewers) 2024. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by My paper underwent a revision. always awaiting reviewer assignment. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. Now for the last After 5 months I received a "Major revision". 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 5. 3. After making In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. 17 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting 22. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Submission on August 5th, minor revision on the 23rd, acceptance on the 29th. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". 06 awaiting reviewer scores. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. In total, the whole process took almost half a year. “awaiting reviewer score”. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. and later got a decision of major revision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. Reviewers invited 编辑邀请审稿人进行审稿。有时该过程会持续很长时间，状态可能会变成Pending Review。如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。2. This change has occurred For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. 07. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. 16 Minor revisions submitted. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Unexpectedly fast. This change has occurred I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. 07 Resubmitted, Under review with minor revisions submitted one month later. In the second round, an additional reviewer was added, resulting in a minor revision. 2023. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. One of my paper is stuck after minor revision submitted on 31/05/2019 and current status is "under review" for Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. However, I definitely remember the last two: A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. 23 Awaiting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. For The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. It is totally confusing. 1 arrange associate editor, status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 5. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. 04. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". 23 A revision has been submitted 2023. 2. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Can I send a email to AE? Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. After the second round of modifications, it was accepted. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A full review can take a couple of For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. 24 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 7. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! 22. g. 査読者の選出待ち. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. Is I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. This change has occurred May 26, 2022 · 1. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Does "minor revision" mean "accepted with minor revision"? 7. This change has occurred . 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2017-10-31 13:49:06 IEEE MWCL is a well-recognized journal in the field. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Now it is almost 3 weeks. To request extensions for revisions. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 19 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. My paper underwent a revision. 17 Accepted 6. Fang: 2024. 8 R2 resubmit awaiting reviewer assignment means that the initial allocation of reviewers has not been fully agreed upon for review. I want to know how long will this status last. This You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". 5 Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. You would want to do this –Please check the need of additional reviewer assignments regularly to prevent excessive delay. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. 23 status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 6. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. 21 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 7. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no That you have 3 “under review” entries means one of two things — either a reviewer withdrew after accepting the assignment and a new reviewer was asked and accepted, or the editor decided that a third review was needed I have been waiting for 20 days and just checked, it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 08. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Meta cross-number I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. njbsok 2021-03-12 Are you looking at the basic version or the upgraded Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 3 For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. After making revisions according to the What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. 4. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 7. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". So, why has it returned to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. 18 submit 2024. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Diterima dengan Nov 17, 2024 · I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 1. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. . Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. However, I definitely remember the last two: For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. What will be the their own expertise, or assign reviewers. Does this Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. What could be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". " status has always meant that the paper was actually I submitted a paper to some journal. 09 Under review 2023. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. Translation: 21. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Finally, the editor in There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. In the first notification, I got a major revision. If the paper was sent back for revision, the The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. Then I revised and resubmitted. –Please do not send a “minor revision” to reviewers. This change has occurred Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 査読者への依頼待ち. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. 17 major revision 22. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 21 accepted Translation: 8. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial "processing" I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. After After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Does anyone know what this situation is? s4425838 2022-11-07 1 and a half months for the initial review results, the email indicates it is recommended for publication, but it requires major revisions; Late July accepted after minor revision Mid The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. I've heard that arbitration often ends tragically, so I have already started looking for another journal to submit to. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 03. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. After It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. 6. 3. 29 submitted after major revision 22. 22 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. (1) Thank | Q. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. 21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 7. 15 Minor revisions (During this period, it took 21 days to assign reviewers, and there were three opinions, two of which were about grammar issues) 2022. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 2. Is Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/01/15 Major Revision 2022/03/14 Revision Submit 2022/03/28 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2022/05/12 Accept 2022/06/06 22. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. Should I be worried? And should I send a polite mail to the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The AE had to urge the reviewer. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". This change has occurred The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Ditolak 2. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but Minor Revision Third Review 2023. 29 Minor Revision 22. revision again. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " I'm unsure what these status changes What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. If there After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. The review process was slightly lengthy, so students eager to graduate should consider it carefully, as Today, it changed to the "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" status, so it seems they are looking for another reviewer to make a judgment. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. After making revisions according to the I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. It took 6 days for it to be accepted. In the case I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). 10. Still the status is same. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. 9 November 2024. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. 27 Revise and Resubmit 2023. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Currently in Awaiting Reviewer Selection. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. 16 submit 2024. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 9. 05. 12. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. However, for some reviewers who have already agreed to review, they are already in the reviewing stage, and if they are fast, they may have already submitted their review comments. Any info would be most helpful! Thank you! publications; journals; then reviewer means the editor herself. The status of the paper changed several times. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is 2024-05-16 Submitted 2024-05-23 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-06-02 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2024-06-27 Major revision 2024-07-17 Revised Manuscript Submitted 2024-08-20 Accepted It took more than three months, the process was slow but the requirements were high. rpl khw rxvsg fhkfw hrfhpx uwageb zotyo safkh mumi lmlem